top of page

"๐๐ซ๐จ, ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐‰๐•๐€ ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ง๐ž๐ž๐๐ฌ ๐ญ๐จ ๐›๐ž ๐’‚ ๐’”๐’Š๐’Ž๐’‘๐’๐’† ๐จ๐ง๐ž. ๐ˆ ๐ค๐ง๐จ๐ฐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐จ๐ญ๐ก๐ž๐ซ ๐ฉ๐š๐ซ๐ญ๐ฒ, ๐ฐ๐ž ๐ ๐จ ๐ฐ๐š๐ฒ ๐›๐š๐œ๐ค"

  • Writer: Rajvin Singh Gill
    Rajvin Singh Gill
  • 5 days ago
  • 2 min read

Sounds familiar?


Joint ventures are built on trust, but they are sustained by documentation.


Recently, we assisted a corporate client in the plantation sector who navigated a complex litigation matter. Our client, a minority shareholder (40%) with the operational expertise to grow and harvest, entered into a joint venture where the majority partner provided the land.


The Joint Venture Agreement (JVA) was personally drafted by the clientโ€™s leadership at the time. While the intent was mutual benefit, the document lacked the critical "salient protections" required to safeguard a minority stake.


The missing pieces were devastating. Amongst others:


โš ๏ธ ๐†๐จ๐ฏ๐ž๐ซ๐ง๐š๐ง๐œ๐ž ๐ˆ๐ฆ๐›๐š๐ฅ๐š๐ง๐œ๐ž - A board of 5 directors (3 from the majority, 2 from our client) with a quorum requirement of ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜บ 3 directors. Effectively, decisions could be made without our client even being in the room.


โš ๏ธ ๐Ž๐ฉ๐ž๐ซ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐š๐ฅ ๐’๐ข๐ฅ๐ž๐ง๐œ๐ž: No specific provisions on bank account mandates or signing authority for company documentation.


โš ๏ธ ๐๐จ ๐‘๐ž๐ฅ๐š๐ญ๐ž๐-๐๐š๐ซ๐ญ๐ฒ ๐…๐ข๐ฅ๐ญ๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ: No oversight on contracts between the JV and the majority shareholderโ€™s other interests.


The Resulting Crisis:


The majority shareholder caused the JV company to sell produce to their own related parties at inflated prices and enter into land tenancies far above market rates. To tighten the grip, they attempted to remove our client as an authorised signatory, replacing them with their own nominees.


Our client instructed us to proceed with a shareholder derivative action and breach of contract claims.


It was a long, messy road - one that could have been entirely avoided with a well-tailored Shareholdersโ€™ Agreement/JVA.


A "handshake deal" or a self-drafted JVA might save on legal fees today, but it can cost you the entire business tomorrow. If you are a minority shareholder, you must ensure your agreement includes (at the very least):


โœ… ๐‘๐ž๐ฌ๐ž๐ซ๐ฏ๐ž๐ ๐Œ๐š๐ญ๐ญ๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ: Veto rights for key decisions (loans, asset sales, related-party deals).


โœ… ๐๐ฎ๐จ๐ซ๐ฎ๐ฆ ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ญ๐ž๐œ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ: Requiring at least one director from each party to be present.


โœ… ๐’๐ญ๐ซ๐ข๐œ๐ญ ๐…๐ข๐ง๐š๐ง๐œ๐ข๐š๐ฅ ๐Œ๐š๐ง๐๐š๐ญ๐ž๐ฌ: Joint "Maker/Checker" authorities that cannot be unilaterally altered.


Protect your investment from the start. Once the dispute starts, the JVA may be the only shield you have.


Comments


Aravind, Atifah & Rajvin

Corporate & Business lawyers

Copyright by Aravind, Atifah & Rajvin. All rights reserved | SEO Services By Maxsdigit

bottom of page